Film comparison
ADOX CHM 400 vs Ilford Delta 400 Professional
What the catalogue holds about each, and the times they share. A dash means a figure has not been read off a datasheet — nothing here is estimated.
Specification side by side
| Film |
ADOX CHM 400
|
Ilford Delta 400 Professional
|
|---|---|---|
| Maker | ADOX | Ilford |
| ISO | 400 | 400 |
| Type | B&W negative | B&W negative |
| Process | B&W | B&W |
| Status | Discontinued | In production |
| Formats | — | — |
| Grain (RMS) | — | — |
| Resolving power | — | — |
| Latitude | — | −1.0 / +3.0 stops |
| First released | — | 2001 |
| Reciprocity data | No | Yes |
| Published times | 3 | 267 |
Developers in common
Each film’s time at its own box speed in the same developer, at the same dilution and temperature. Every time opens the full table for that film in that developer.
| Dilution · °C | CHM 400 EI 400 | Delta 400 Professional EI 400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1+9 · 20 °C | 11:00 | 10:00 |
| Dilution · °C | CHM 400 EI 400 | Delta 400 Professional EI 400 |
|---|---|---|
| stock · 20 °C | 8:30 | 7:00 |