Film comparison
Foma Ortho 400 vs Kodak Tri-X 400
What the catalogue holds about each, and the times they share. A dash means a figure has not been read off a datasheet — nothing here is estimated.
Specification side by side
| Film |
Foma Ortho 400
|
Kodak Tri-X 400
|
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Foma | Kodak |
| ISO | 400 | 400 |
| Type | B&W negative | B&W negative |
| Process | B&W | B&W |
| Status | In production | In production |
| Formats | — | — |
| Grain (RMS) | — | — |
| Resolving power | — | — |
| Latitude | — | — |
| First released | 2023 | — |
| Reciprocity data | No | No |
| Published times | 22 | 206 |
Developers in common
Each film’s time at its own box speed in the same developer, at the same dilution and temperature. Every time opens the full table for that film in that developer.
| Dilution · °C | Foma Ortho 400 EI 400 | Tri-X 400 EI 400 |
|---|---|---|
| stock · 20 °C | 6:00 | 7:00 |
| Dilution · °C | Foma Ortho 400 EI 400 | Tri-X 400 EI 400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1+50 · 20 °C | 10:00 | 13:00 |
| Dilution · °C | Foma Ortho 400 EI 400 | Tri-X 400 EI 400 |
|---|---|---|
| stock · 20 °C | 7:00 | 6:45 |