- Compare
- Retropan 320 Soft vs Tri-X
Film comparison
Foma Retropan 320 Soft vs Kodak Tri-X
What the catalogue holds about each, and the times they share. A dash means a figure has not been read off a datasheet — nothing here is estimated.
Specification side by side
| Film |
Foma Retropan 320 Soft
|
Kodak Tri-X
|
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Foma | Kodak |
| ISO | 320 | 320 |
| Type | B&W negative | B&W negative |
| Process | B&W | B&W |
| Status | Discontinued (2021) | In production |
| Formats | — | — |
| Grain (RMS) | — | — |
| Resolving power | — | — |
| Latitude | — | — |
| First released | 2015 | 1940 |
| Reciprocity data | No | No |
| Published times | 12 | 217 |
Developers in common
Each film’s time at its own box speed in the same developer, at the same dilution and temperature. Every time opens the full table for that film in that developer.
| Dilution · °C | Retropan 320 Soft EI 320 | Tri-X EI 320 |
|---|---|---|
| Dilution B (1+31) · 20 °C | 7:00 | 4:45 |