- Compare
- Retropan 320 Soft vs UN75
Film comparison
Foma Retropan 320 Soft vs SFL UN75
What the catalogue holds about each, and the times they share. A dash means a figure has not been read off a datasheet — nothing here is estimated.
Specification side by side
| Film |
Foma Retropan 320 Soft
|
SFL UN75
|
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Foma | SFL |
| ISO | 320 | 320 |
| Type | B&W negative | B&W negative |
| Process | B&W | B&W |
| Status | Discontinued (2021) | In production |
| Formats | — | — |
| Grain (RMS) | — | — |
| Resolving power | — | — |
| Latitude | — | — |
| First released | 2015 | — |
| Reciprocity data | No | No |
| Published times | 12 | 0 |
Developers in common
Each film’s time at its own box speed in the same developer, at the same dilution and temperature. Every time opens the full table for that film in that developer.
No developer has a time for all of these at the same dilution and temperature
Each film’s own page lists every developer it has published times in.