- Compare
- Delta 3200 Professional vs T-Max P3200
Film comparison
Ilford Delta 3200 Professional vs Kodak T-Max P3200
What the catalogue holds about each, and the times they share. A dash means a figure has not been read off a datasheet — nothing here is estimated.
Specification side by side
| Film |
Ilford Delta 3200 Professional
|
Kodak T-Max P3200
|
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Ilford | Kodak |
| ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Type | B&W negative | B&W negative |
| Process | B&W | B&W |
| Status | In production | In production |
| Formats | — | — |
| Grain (RMS) | — | — |
| Resolving power | — | — |
| Latitude | −1.0 / +3.0 stops | — |
| First released | 1998 | 1988 |
| Reciprocity data | Yes | No |
| Published times | 107 | 471 |
Developers in common
Each film’s time at its own box speed in the same developer, at the same dilution and temperature. Every time opens the full table for that film in that developer.
| Dilution · °C | Delta 3200 Professional EI 3200 | T-Max P3200 EI 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| stock · 20 °C | 8:00 | 13:00 |
Also with a box-speed time for each film, but not at a shared dilution and temperature: Fomadon R09.