- Compare
- Tri-X 400 vs Xtreme 400
Film comparison
Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ultrafine Xtreme 400
What the catalogue holds about each, and the times they share. A dash means a figure has not been read off a datasheet — nothing here is estimated.
Specification side by side
| Film |
Kodak Tri-X 400
|
Ultrafine Xtreme 400
|
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Kodak | Ultrafine |
| ISO | 400 | 400 |
| Type | B&W negative | B&W negative |
| Process | B&W | B&W |
| Status | In production | In production |
| Formats | — | — |
| Grain (RMS) | — | — |
| Resolving power | — | — |
| Latitude | — | — |
| First released | — | — |
| Reciprocity data | No | No |
| Published times | 206 | 4 |
Developers in common
Each film’s time at its own box speed in the same developer, at the same dilution and temperature. Every time opens the full table for that film in that developer.
| Dilution · °C | Tri-X 400 EI 400 | Xtreme 400 EI 400 |
|---|---|---|
| stock · 20 °C | 6:45 | 7:00 |
| 1+1 · 20 °C | 9:45 | 12:30 |
| Dilution · °C | Tri-X 400 EI 400 | Xtreme 400 EI 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Dilution B (1+31) · 20 °C | 3:45 | 5:00 |