Film comparison
dubblefilm Apollo vs Lomography Color Tiger 200
What the catalogue holds about each, and the times they share. A dash means a figure has not been read off a datasheet — nothing here is estimated.
Specification side by side
| Film |
dubblefilm Apollo
|
Lomography Color Tiger 200
|
|---|---|---|
| Maker | dubblefilm | Lomography |
| ISO | 200 | 200 |
| Type | Colour negative | Colour negative |
| Process | C-41 | C-41 |
| Status | In production | In production |
| Formats | — | — |
| Grain (RMS) | — | — |
| Resolving power | — | — |
| Latitude | — | — |
| First released | 2017 | 2022 |
| Reciprocity data | No | No |
| Published times | 12 | 12 |
Developers in common
Each film’s time at its own box speed in the same developer, at the same dilution and temperature. Every time opens the full table for that film in that developer.
| Dilution · °C | Apollo EI 200 | Color Tiger 200 EI 200 |
|---|---|---|
| working solution · 30 °C | 8:00 | 8:00 |
| working solution · 38 °C | 3:15 | 3:15 |
| Dilution · °C | Apollo EI 200 | Color Tiger 200 EI 200 |
|---|---|---|
| working solution · 22 °C | 50:00 | 50:00 |
| working solution · 24 °C | 35:00 | 35:00 |
| working solution · 27 °C | 21:00 | 21:00 |
| working solution · 29.5 °C | 13:00 | 13:00 |
| working solution · 32 °C | 8:30 | 8:30 |
| working solution · 35 °C | 5:45 | 5:45 |
| working solution · 39 °C | 3:30 | 3:30 |
| Dilution · °C | Apollo EI 200 | Color Tiger 200 EI 200 |
|---|---|---|
| working solution · 38 °C | 3:00 | 3:00 |
| working solution · 39 °C | 3:30 | 3:30 |
| Dilution · °C | Apollo EI 200 | Color Tiger 200 EI 200 |
|---|---|---|
| working solution · 38 °C | 3:15 | 3:15 |