Film comparison
Harman technology Phoenix II 200 vs dubblefilm Apollo
What the catalogue holds about each, and the times they share. A dash means a figure has not been read off a datasheet — nothing here is estimated.
Specification side by side
| Film |
Harman technology Phoenix II 200
|
dubblefilm Apollo
|
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Harman technology | dubblefilm |
| ISO | 200 | 200 |
| Type | Colour negative | Colour negative |
| Process | C-41 | C-41 |
| Status | In production | In production |
| Formats | — | — |
| Grain (RMS) | — | — |
| Resolving power | — | — |
| Latitude | — | — |
| First released | 2025 | 2017 |
| Reciprocity data | No | No |
| Published times | 12 | 12 |
Developers in common
Each film’s time at its own box speed in the same developer, at the same dilution and temperature. Every time opens the full table for that film in that developer.
| Dilution · °C | Phoenix II 200 EI 200 | Apollo EI 200 |
|---|---|---|
| working solution · 30 °C | 8:00 | 8:00 |
| working solution · 38 °C | 3:15 | 3:15 |
| Dilution · °C | Phoenix II 200 EI 200 | Apollo EI 200 |
|---|---|---|
| working solution · 22 °C | 50:00 | 50:00 |
| working solution · 24 °C | 35:00 | 35:00 |
| working solution · 27 °C | 21:00 | 21:00 |
| working solution · 29.5 °C | 13:00 | 13:00 |
| working solution · 32 °C | 8:30 | 8:30 |
| working solution · 35 °C | 5:45 | 5:45 |
| working solution · 39 °C | 3:30 | 3:30 |
| Dilution · °C | Phoenix II 200 EI 200 | Apollo EI 200 |
|---|---|---|
| working solution · 38 °C | 3:00 | 3:00 |
| working solution · 39 °C | 3:30 | 3:30 |
| Dilution · °C | Phoenix II 200 EI 200 | Apollo EI 200 |
|---|---|---|
| working solution · 38 °C | 3:15 | 3:15 |