- Compare
- Tri-X 400 vs GP3 400 PAN
Film comparison
Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Shanghai Photosensitive Materials GP3 400 PAN
What the catalogue holds about each, and the times they share. A dash means a figure has not been read off a datasheet — nothing here is estimated.
Specification side by side
| Film |
Kodak Tri-X 400
|
Shanghai Photosensitive Materials GP3 400 PAN
|
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Kodak | Shanghai Photosensitive Materials |
| ISO | 400 | 400 |
| Type | B&W negative | B&W negative |
| Process | B&W | B&W |
| Status | In production | In production |
| Formats | — | — |
| Grain (RMS) | — | — |
| Resolving power | — | — |
| Latitude | — | — |
| First released | — | 2019 |
| Reciprocity data | No | No |
| Published times | 216 | 0 |
Developers in common
Each film’s time at its own box speed in the same developer, at the same dilution and temperature. Every time opens the full table for that film in that developer.
No developer has a time for all of these at the same dilution and temperature
Each film’s own page lists every developer it has published times in.