- Compare
- Tri-X vs Retropan 320 Soft
Film comparison
Kodak Tri-X vs Foma Retropan 320 Soft
What the catalogue holds about each, and the times they share. A dash means a figure has not been read off a datasheet — nothing here is estimated.
Specification side by side
| Film |
Kodak Tri-X
|
Foma Retropan 320 Soft
|
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Kodak | Foma |
| ISO | 320 | 320 |
| Type | B&W negative | B&W negative |
| Process | B&W | B&W |
| Status | In production | Discontinued (2021) |
| Formats | — | — |
| Grain (RMS) | — | — |
| Resolving power | — | — |
| Latitude | — | — |
| First released | 1940 | 2015 |
| Reciprocity data | No | No |
| Published times | 217 | 12 |
Developers in common
Each film’s time at its own box speed in the same developer, at the same dilution and temperature. Every time opens the full table for that film in that developer.
| Dilution · °C | Tri-X EI 320 | Retropan 320 Soft EI 320 |
|---|---|---|
| Dilution B (1+31) · 20 °C | 4:45 | 7:00 |