- Compare
- U200 vs Fomapan 200 Creative
Film comparison
Silberra U200 vs Fomapan 200 Creative
What the catalogue holds about each, and the times they share. A dash means a figure has not been read off a datasheet — nothing here is estimated.
Specification side by side
| Film |
Silberra U200
|
Fomapan 200 Creative
|
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Silberra | Foma |
| ISO | 200 | 200 |
| Type | B&W negative | B&W negative |
| Process | B&W | B&W |
| Status | In production | In production |
| Formats | — | — |
| Grain (RMS) | — | 14.0 |
| Resolving power | — | 110 lp/mm |
| Latitude | — | −2.0 / +1.0 stops |
| First released | 2018 | 1996 |
| Reciprocity data | No | No |
| Published times | 12 | 38 |
Developers in common
Each film’s time at its own box speed in the same developer, at the same dilution and temperature. Every time opens the full table for that film in that developer.
| Dilution · °C | U200 EI 200 | Fomapan 200 Creative EI 200 |
|---|---|---|
| stock · 20 °C | 15:00 | 6:00 |
| Dilution · °C | U200 EI 200 | Fomapan 200 Creative EI 200 |
|---|---|---|
| stock · 20 °C | 6:00 | 5:00 |