- Compare
- U200 vs SFX 200
Film comparison
Silberra U200 vs Ilford SFX 200
What the catalogue holds about each, and the times they share. A dash means a figure has not been read off a datasheet — nothing here is estimated.
Specification side by side
| Film |
Silberra U200
|
Ilford SFX 200
|
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Silberra | Ilford |
| ISO | 200 | 200 |
| Type | B&W negative | B&W negative |
| Process | B&W | B&W |
| Status | In production | In production |
| Formats | — | — |
| Grain (RMS) | — | — |
| Resolving power | — | — |
| Latitude | — | — |
| First released | 2018 | 2007 |
| Reciprocity data | No | Yes |
| Published times | 12 | 63 |
Developers in common
Each film’s time at its own box speed in the same developer, at the same dilution and temperature. Every time opens the full table for that film in that developer.
| Dilution · °C | U200 EI 200 | SFX 200 EI 200 |
|---|---|---|
| stock · 20 °C | 15:00 | 14:30 |
| Dilution · °C | U200 EI 200 | SFX 200 EI 200 |
|---|---|---|
| stock · 20 °C | 6:00 | 10:00 |
| 1+1 · 20 °C | 12:00 | 14:30 |
| Dilution · °C | U200 EI 200 | SFX 200 EI 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Dilution B (1+31) · 20 °C | 4:30 | 9:00 |
| Dilution · °C | U200 EI 200 | SFX 200 EI 200 |
|---|---|---|
| stock · 20 °C | 8:30 | 7:00 |